El 19/04/2005, a las 13:17, Iljitsch van Beijnum escribió:
On 19-apr-05, at 11:46, marcelo bagnulo braun wrote:
There are two obvious options:
1. The flow label is relevant regardless of the addresses: this
can't work because of the possibility of clashes with flow labels
in unrelated packets
2. The flow label is only relevant with certain source/dest address
combinations: but what's the additional benefit of the flow label
here, we can demultiplex on the addresses
Well, there could packets with the same src and dst address, that
belong to different communications with different ULIDs, right? the
flow label is to determine the proper demux context.
Under what circumstances would having different associations between
the same source and destination locator sets be necessary and/or
useful?
Well, i think they may occur pretty naturally, and that we probably
need to do something in order to avoid it from happening.