[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: failure detection

To: john.loughney@nokia.com
Subject: RE: failure detection
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:18:08 +0100 (IST)
Cc: iljitsch@muada.com, shim6@psg.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508151626210.7023@sheen.jakma.org>
Mail-copies-to: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
Mail-followup-to: paul@hibernia.jakma.org
References: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478D9EF00A@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0508151626210.7023@sheen.jakma.org>

On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Paul Jakma wrote:

- INADDR_ANY per default for its local source and the OS

Or even IN6ADDR_ANY, or whatever is appropriate for the version of IP 'substrate' concerned.

regards,
--
Paul Jakma	paul@clubi.ie	paul@jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Isn't it strange that the same people that laugh at gypsy fortune
tellers take economists seriously?

References:
- RE: failure detection
  - From: <john.loughney@nokia.com>
- RE: failure detection
  - From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>

Prev by Date: RE: failure detection
Next by Date: Re: failure detection
Previous by thread: RE: failure detection
Next by thread: Re: failure detection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread