[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: slides for the failure detection discussion
- To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
- Subject: Re: slides for the failure detection discussion
- From: Pierre Baume <pierre@baume.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 23:09:16 +0100
- Cc: shim6 <shim6@psg.com>
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=REayobjUG/pNJUaEGzPywFw8fHrYhM3gCIGHoDkatozLW4NZL7JjxgDjHs5fXfyhcXV3FEBf9W9pbArxrA8xbDr3IpCawSmMAL+Pl60NhHALA6HaXpNbUDugDl9RNtG79fgVPOaYvWJU0/iMmh9TBGmBckLberBmHxfo0QzAOAA=
- In-reply-to: <4374CB45.7070002@piuha.net>
- References: <4374CB45.7070002@piuha.net>
Hi Jari,
Thanks for the slides.
Am I the only one thinking that we're trying to reinvent ACKs? :-)
Pierre.
On 11/11/05, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
>
> http://www.arkko.com/publications/shim6/ietf64_shim_faildet.ppt