[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Review comments on draft-ietf-shim6-proto-03.txt]

To: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Review comments on draft-ietf-shim6-proto-03.txt]
From: Erik Nordmark <erik.nordmark@sun.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:13:14 -0800
Cc: shim6@psg.com
In-reply-to: <C7FA54B9-5A4E-4A61-A488-82A30B008E09@kurtis.pp.se>
References: <43F4C430.2000108@sun.com> <C7FA54B9-5A4E-4A61-A488-82A30B008E09@kurtis.pp.se>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060113)

Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:


I do make the observation that our charter says :

o Compatibility will remain for existing mobility mechanisms. It will
be possible to use Mobile IPv6 on a node that also supports Shim6.
However, any optimizations or advanced configurations are out of
scope for shim6.

So I am kind of inclined to agree with Geoff :-)

Although I can't say I feel strongly either...


I know what the charter says and I don't have problem with that.

But I don't think the charter text means that we can't make*observations* in our documents - there are no optimizations or advancedconfigurations specified in the text that is in the document.


   Erik

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fwd: Review comments on draft-ietf-shim6-proto-03.txt]
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>

References:
- [Fwd: Review comments on draft-ietf-shim6-proto-03.txt]
  - From: Erik Nordmark <erik.nordmark@sun.com>
- Re: [Fwd: Review comments on draft-ietf-shim6-proto-03.txt]
  - From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>

Prev by Date: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nordmark-shim6-esd-00.txt]
Next by Date: Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: Review comments on draft-ietf-shim6-proto-03.txt]
Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Review comments on draft-ietf-shim6-proto-03.txt]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread