RE: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 advances in ARIN]

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

I agree.
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-shim6@psg.com [mailto:owner-shim6@psg.com] On 
> Behalf Of Patrick W. Gilmore
> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 12:10 AM
> To: Iljitsch van Beijnum
> Cc: Patrick W. Gilmore; shim6-wg; ppml@arin.net; 
> global-v6@lists.apnic.net; IETF Discussion; 
> address-policy-wg@ripe.net; v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [narten@us.ibm.com: PI addressing in IPv6 
> advances in ARIN]
> 
> On Apr 14, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> 
> > On 14-apr-2006, at 16:57, Scott Leibrand wrote:
> >
> >> 60 voted in favor of moving forward with PI.  6 voted against.
> >
> > Wow, 10 to 1. Amazing.
> >
> > Even more amazing: 60 people who represent nobody but their own 
> > paycheck get to blow up the internet.
> >
> > Where is ICANN when you need it? This little experiment in 
> playground 
> > democracy has to end before people get hurt.
> 
> Wow, Iljitsch, I have never lost so much respect so quickly for  
> someone who was not flaming a specific person or using profanity.   
> Congratulations.
> 
> 
> Back on topic, it is not just those 60 people - the "playground"  
> appears to overwhelmingly agree with their position.  I know I do.
> 
> I am sorry your technical arguments have not persuaded us in 
> the past.  But I would urge you to stick to those, or at 
> least consider why we remain unconvinced, rather than devolve 
> into .. whatever that post was supposed to be.
> 
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
> 
>