On 21-jul-2006, at 16:27, Francis Dupont wrote:
=> as TLS is in fact a session protocol this idea is good. The only issue is it can work only when TLS is used... Unfortunately IMHO we need a protocol at the network layer, no transport (aka SCTP) or session (aka TLS) even it is more (too?) easy.
Why??
=> just because we don't want to rewrite all applications to use SCTP or TLS.Or this is not your question?
My suggestion was to protect the shim signalling with TLS, not the ULP traffic.