ICMP message for ingress filtering

[Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>]

Hi shimmers,

After a discussion about performing proxy shim operation and the  
acceptability of NAT for that, it occurs to me that we never actually  
solved the ingress filtering issue.
When a host connects to ISPs A and B and then sends a packet with a  
source address from ISP A's address range out to ISP B, it's likely  
that ISP B will drop the packet because it has an "invalid" source  
address. Solving this in the general case is non-trivial, but I think  
it should be possible to get us most of the way there with a fairly  
simple mechanism: a new "source address prohibited" ICMP message. Just  
like when a host receives a "destination unreachable" message it tries  
a different destination address, receiving a "source address  
prohibited" message would make the host try a different source address.
Since this isn't a shim6- or even IPv6-specific issue (IPv4 hosts can  
also have multiple addresses, it's just not all that common) this  
would probably have to happen in the internet area working group but I  
thought I'd ask for feedback from this wg first.
The reason this came up in regard to shim6 proxying is that if a host  
behind such a proxy has ULA addresses or another address type with  
similar properties, it would be necessary to perform NAT to  
communicate with legacy IPv6 destinations. If you give the host behind  
the proxy regular PA addresses on the other hand, you are still  
largely bound by the limitations of those addresses. Alternatively, we  
could give a proxied host both ULA-like identifier addresses for use  
towards shim6-capable destinations and regular PA addresses for use  
towards legacy destinations. RFC 3484 address selection should help  
select the right source address here, but this isn't fool proof. So in  
case the host selects the wrong type of address, the proxy could send  
back a "source address prohibited" ICMP message and the host would  
retry with a different source address.
It would be good to get this into host IPv6 stacks even if routers  
won't support it immediately so that we can make use of this when we  
create shim6 proxies.
An ICMP message like this would also be useful for sites that would  
like to use ULA addressing for their internal network but regular  
addresses for connectivity to the internet.