[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft minutes from the sming interim:

To: david.durham@intel.com
Subject: Re: draft minutes from the sming interim:
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 10:09:08 +0200
Cc: sming@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <10C8636AE359D4119118009027AE998719B46D92@fmsmsx34.fm.intel.com>(david.durham@intel.com)
References: <10C8636AE359D4119118009027AE998719B46D92@fmsmsx34.fm.intel.com>

>>>>> Durham, David writes:

Dave> [Dave] People didn't really seem to care about what comment
Dave> style was used (a gratuitous change?). If you are now not in
Dave> favor of changing the comment style, then there very likely
Dave> isn't group consensus for doing it. So this is no-change, other
Dave> than a minor fix. Does anyone on the list wish the smi --
Dave> comment style change to something else???

Not sure we are in sync. I said that we should use // semantics (a
comment always ends at the end of the line but continue to use --
characters. This is different from keeping the ASN.1 comments.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder    <http://www.informatik.uni-osnabrueck.de/schoenw/>

References:
- RE: draft minutes from the sming interim:
  - From: "Durham, David" <david.durham@intel.com>

Prev by Date: RE: draft minutes from the sming interim:
Next by Date: Re: draft minutes from the sming interim:
Previous by thread: Re: draft minutes from the sming interim:
Next by thread: Re: draft minutes from the sming interim:
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread