[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FW: new version of TE framework draft
- To: <te-wg@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: FW: new version of TE framework draft
- From: "Daniel Awduche" <awduche@movaz.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:30:53 -0400
- Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 07:37:10 -0700
- Envelope-to: te-wg-data@psg.com
- Thread-Index: AcDCg6gRnL6x101pQQiImfGk60KMdQACdhujAAGbwDg=
- Thread-Topic: new version of TE framework draft
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Awduche
Sent: Wed 4/11/2001 10:28 AM
To: Dirk Ooms; xiaoxipe
Cc: te-wg@UU.NET; xxiao@photuris.com; angela.chiu@celion.com;
indra.widjaja@fnc.fujitsu.com; anwar@lucent.com; Daniel Awduche
Subject: RE: new version of TE framework draft
Dirk,
We did not dwell on multicast TE aspects in the framework
draft for the following reasons:
- Multicast TE is still pretty much a research topic.
- There was no service provider interest in pursuing the topic.
When the framework draft was first written, three of the
co-authors
worked for three major service providers. Additionally, input
was solicited from many others. The clear feedback was that
Multicast TE was not considered a substantial issue in
present
operational contexts.
Regards,
/Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Dirk Ooms
Sent: Wed 4/11/2001 8:35 AM
To: xiaoxipe
Cc: te-wg@UU.NET; xxiao@photuris.com; Daniel Awduche;
angela.chiu@celion.com; indra.widjaja@fnc.fujitsu.com; anwar@lucent.com
Subject: Re: new version of TE framework draft
The draft doesn't discuss multicast TE. Is it because
there is no
operator interest, there is no experience, nobody wants
to break his/her
brains on it or ....?
dirk
xiaoxipe wrote:
>
> A new version of the TE framework draft
"draft-ietf-tewg-framework-03.txt"
> is attached. We've addressed the issues raised on the
mailing list during
> the last call. A text file describing all the changes
made is also attached.
>
> In summary, we didn't see any significant issues
during the previous last
> call. Therefore, there is no change of technical
substance in this new version.
> Some re-wording is done in section 6: the original
"requirements" are now
> re-worded as "recommendations".
>
> Comments are welcome. We would like to request that
the WG issue a
> last call on it shortly.
>
> Xi-Peng
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name:
draft-ietf-tewg-framework-03.txt
> draft-ietf-tewg-framework-03.txt Type: Plain
Text (text/plain)
> Encoding: 7bit
>
> Name: changes.txt
> changes.txt Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
> Encoding: quoted-printable
--
Dirk Ooms
mailto:dirk.ooms@alcatel.be
tel:+32 3 2404732
Network Strategy Group (NSG)
http://aww.alcatel.com/nsg
Alcatel http://www.alcatel.com