[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
TE MIB (-06.txt) : tunnel instance
- To: te-wg@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: TE MIB (-06.txt) : tunnel instance
- From: Sonam Thapa <aos824@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 06:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
- Delivery-date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:06:30 -0700
- Envelope-to: te-wg-data@psg.com
I am a bit confused by the mplsTunnelInstance
parameter in the MIB. Should each tunnel not have
its own name, index etc, even if it has the same
parameters as another tunnel. If this is so,
mplsTunnelInstance is not needed right?
Or does current equipment support such "multiple"
instances of the tunnel? If so what advantages
does it have over 2 tunnels which differ in the
index and name fields.
Can the authors/implementors please comemnt.
TIA,
-aos.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/