Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-tewg-mib-01.txt

[Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>]

> Do you think you could put a note in the draft somewhere to that effect?
> Perhaps in sections 2, 3 and 5.

Okay, will do.

> Given this, is teTunnelSource provided for completeness or to allow multiple
> source addresses on one node (e.g. interfaces, virtual routers).  If the
> latter, have you considered whether it is reasonable to allow the same
> name to be used for two tunnels on different source addresses?

The latter; it's probably reasonable to assume that tunnels on a *box*
are uniquely named.

> Will you choose an arbitrary index, or will you use something handy like
> tunnel index?  If you use tunnel index, you may find you need a secondary
> index such as tunnel instance

An arbitrary index, accompanied by a note saying that the tunnel index
(whatever that is) is a perfectly acceptable value.  It's interesting
that the MPLS TE MIB doesn't say what "tunnel index" is, although its
range is suggestive.

> (watch out, though, you don't want to turn
> it into draft-ietf-mpls-te-mib ;-)

Oh, a few indices won't get me there.  I'd have to split the mib into
three and add about a hundred pages to even get close :-)  Of course,
this is just a simple little mib that doesn't do much.

Kireeti.