Re: could we agree on this ? Fwd: RE: TE Requirements Draft - ELSP

[Nabil Seddigh <nseddigh@tropicnetworks.com>]

Francois,

One key item of note. In an earlier email, you had stated that 
Nabil/Sudhakar asked for option (3). This is not quite accurate.

We had argued for the ability to signal BW for multiple OAs on 
a single LSP. In addition, we argued for the ability to advertise
BW for multiple OAs (classes) in the IGP. How the CSPF is done
is a proprietary matter. It is not governed by the standards!

Best,
Nabil



> 
> 3) using E-LSPs with traffic from multiple OAs each with their own SPF
> ======================================================================
> This is the option I proposed to keep out of the Reqts draft for now. This
> is also the option you described above as "practically very complicated,
> since it requires dynamic aggregation and splitting of OAs."  Can we agree
> to keep this out of REQTS draft?
> 
> 2) using E-LSPs with traffic from multiple OAs but using single CSPF
> =====================================================================
> I think we actually need to break this up in 2 cases:
> 
> 2a) using E-LSPs with traffic from multiple OAs but using single CSPF and
> SINGLE bandwidth
> =============================================