[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ash-multi-area-te-reqmts-01.txt
Jim:
-> I thought it was the consensus of the team, and the WG that
-> there were not
-> immediate needs for vertical hierarchy, and indeed the needs for
-> horizontal were rather simple at this time (at least as
-> viewed by people
-> who would intend to use any of this any time soon).
Very sad to hear about this consensus. I see all the
Transport Area protocols are developing full fledged
features (good protocols like SIP) and lower layers
are capable of transporting gigs per second. We as a
group are not crossing *area* boundaries.
When are we going to ensure end-to-end QoS then?
When can we expect a SIP/Megaco call traversing countries
in the Internet using muti-area/AS (DiffServ) TE
(with better QoS than we have today)?
This is all circular dependency - "need and/or solution".
It doesn't matter whether a *separate draft* or not.
But some set of requirements or a unified solution is
needed (in the roadmap).
--Venkata Naidu