RE: What we disagree on RE: TE Requirements Draft-ELSP

[Shai Herzog <sherzog@hyperchip.com>]

Francois,

>-----Original Message-----
>If I understand correctly, this is where we stand :
>         - Nabil is saying, let's allow (ii) and (iiia)
>         - Shai is saying, let's not allow (ii) nor (iiia)
>         - Francois is saying, let's allow (ii) but not (iiia).

Your correct regarding my position. I think the "Single BW or CSPF" doesn't
exist and has no meaning (other than random or arbitrary). Multiple BW/CSPF
exist, but pose horrendous danger to network stability (one that can be
lurking and not obvious before dissaster strikes). 
However, I believe in democracy, so I would correct the "not allow" to "not
sanction and warn against". If someone wants to drive into the wall, at
least he/she won't be able to come back and blame us for designing a faulty
and dangerous standard.

>At least, my religion is more middle-of-the-ground than either
>of yours. '^)

Let me see. Lets think religion... So, I believe in evolution, you believe
in a combination of evolution and creationism, and Nabil believes in pure
creationism. In this case, I like being on the extreme side ;-)

Shai

>
>Cheers
>
>Francois
>