Additional Error Handling scenario for draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-proto-

[Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch@cisco.com>]

Hi,

I got a similar comment from two people about a potential inconsistency 
between CT and PSC which could arise in some cases.

To address that, we could add some text explaining that in the case where:
	- L-LSPs are used
	- an intermediate LSR happens to have some local knowledge of relationship 
between PSCs and CTs (e.g. because the LSR implements some fancy scheduler 
weights adjustments)
	- the PSC and CT signaled are inconsitent with the local knowledge of 
PSC/CT relationbship,
then the LSR must reject the setup and send Error Message "xyz".

Thoughts/comments/concerns about that?

Cheers

Francois