[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-04.txt
So it is more of a contribution to the OSPF WG, not the TEWG?
I'll ask ietf-secretary to make the corresponding changes.
You might want to forward the announce message to OSPF WG.
thanks,
Jim
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Pyda Srisuresh wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> The draft was not on the OSPF agenda for 51st IETF (London) or the 55th
> IETF(Atlanta), as far as
> I can tell. Besides, I did not attend either of the two IETFs. I did attend
> the Utah IETF (52nd). But,
> there wasn't a slot for OSPF. Oh, well..
>
> You are right, the above OSPF-TE draft is a competing draft to
> draft-katz-yeung.
> The OSPF-TE draft does more than TE topology discovery and restricted
> flooding along the
> topology. The draft also covers inter-area TE and pre-engineered circuit
> path LSAs.
> A stand-alone TE-LSDB, independent of the native LSDB is generated for TE
> computations.
>
> Please send in any comments you might have on the draft. Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> suresh
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Boyle [mailto:jboyle@pdnets.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 6:52 AM
> To: te-wg@ops.ietf.org
> Cc: srisuresh@yahoo.com; pjoseph@Force10Networks.com
> Subject: draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-04.txt
>
>
> This was on the agenda for the 51st and 55th IETF, but no presentation
> (I think I remeber some discussion at the 51st, but it's not in the
> minutes).
>
> Also, no discussion on the lists.
>
> What's up with this? Does anyone see a need to toss out
> draft-katz-yeung-ospf-traffic-09.txt
> for draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-04.txt so that non TE nodes
> don't have to be bothered with the opaque LSA? Or
> is there a grander scope to this?
>
> If not, I'm not sure why we keep seeing this draft rev change
> as an individual contribution to tewg.
>
> Jim
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 08:12:35 -0500
> From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
> To: IETF-Announce: ;
> Cc: te-wg@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-04.txt
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Internet Traffic Engineering Working Group
> of the IETF.
>
> Title : OSPF-TE: An experimental extension to OSPF for
> Traffic
> Engineering
> Author(s) : P. Srisuresh, P. Joseph
> Filename : draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-04.txt
> Pages : 45
> Date : 2002-12-9
>
> This document defines OSPF-TE, an experimental traffic engineering
> (TE) extension to the link-state routing protocol OSPF. New TE
> LSAs are designed to disseminate TE metrics within an autonomous
> System (AS) - intra-area as well as inter-area. An Autonomous
> System may consist of TE and non-TE nodes. Non-TE nodes are
> uneffected by the distribution of TE LSAs. A stand-alone TE Link
> State Database (TE-LSDB), separate from the native OSPF LSDB, is
> generated for the computation of TE circuit paths. OSPF-TE is
> also extendible to non-packet networks such as SONET/TDM and
> optical networks. A transition path is provided for those
> currently using [OPQLSA-TE] and wish to adapt OSPF-TE.
>
> A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-04.txt
>
> To remove yourself from the IETF Announcement list, send a message to
> ietf-announce-request with the word unsubscribe in the body of the message.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username
> "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in,
> type "cd internet-drafts" and then
> "get draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-04.txt".
>
> A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in
> http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>
>
> Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail.
>
> Send a message to:
> mailserv@ietf.org.
> In the body type:
> "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-srisuresh-ospf-te-04.txt".
>
> NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in
> MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this
> feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE"
> command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or
> a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers
> exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with
> "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split
> up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on
> how to manipulate these messages.
>
>
> Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
> implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
> Internet-Draft.
>