RE: Weak turnout : was-> A proposal for moving ahead on BC models

[ogino <ogino@kddilabs.jp>]

Dear TEWGers:

I read it and now I see no problems or objections through the discussion on 
the TEWG mailing list.

Best regards,

Nagao Ogino


At 00:56 03/01/23 +0100, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
>Thank you very much Vijay. That was/is exactly what I worry about.
>If not enough people (and 10 is the absolute minumum, but having seen
>the attendence of TWEG sessions, I'd expect 25 or more) can speak up
>to state one of:
>
>  - I read it and I am positive, it is good stuff
>  - I read it and I see no problems or objections
>  - I read it but I cannot determine if it is bad, but I can see that
>    what has been discussed in the WG is indeed in the document
>  - I read it and I have these nits/objections...
>  - I did not read it cause this is not relevant to my xxx job/work/function
>  - I did not read it cause I think this is nonsense
>
>Then I get the feeling that we're just allowing a small group of
>people push their petty-project through the process. That seems NOT
>good to me. We need serious WG participation in reading and commenting
>in one of these forums above, before we can declare that we have WG
>consensus on a document to be presented to IESG for approval as RFC
>(in whatever form).
>
>Bert

******************************
Nagao Ogino, Dr. Eng.
KDDI R & D Laboratories Inc.
2-1-15 Ohara, Kamifukuoka-shi,
Saitama 356-8502 Japan
TEL   +81 49 278 7860
FAX   +81 49 278 7516
E-mail   ogino@kddilabs.jp
******************************