RE: Agenda for TEWG @ IETF 56 (fwd)

[Edward Kern <ejk@tech.org>]

> You didn't ask for suggested agenda items
Your correct we didn't.


> (I guess it's your prerogative
> to just decree the agenda)
Your again correct, it is.

> , but here are suggestions anyway.
>
> > 30		Diffserv TE			Francois
> > 		- Requirements
> > 		- Protocol
> > 		- BC Models
> > 		  - Russian
> > 		  - MAM
> Most of the on-going discussion/issues relative to DSTE is on BC models,
> including MAR
> http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ash-mpls-dste-bcmodel-max-alloc-res
> v-01.txt.  So I think MAR should be included in the BC models discussion
> (per attached email).  There's been a fair amount of discussion of MAR on
> the list, I don't think you should just ignore it.

Not ignored it just didn't make the list because it has not had as much 
discussion
as the others.  I have no issue tacking MAR on the end though.


> Furthermore, I don't think it's appropriate to designate Francois to
> discuss Wai Sum's I-D on MAM
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wlai-tewg-bcmodel-01.txt.
Francois is leading the overall discussion like he has done in the past. 
It wasn't
his intent or our desire to have him discussing other authors papers unless 
they are
not present.  Wai Sum is of course more then welcome to lead the discussion 
around MAM.


> I suggest some of the time allocated to Francois' discussion be allocated
> to Wai Sum and me for discussion of MAM & MAR, respectively.
A section of time will be made available consistant with the time given to 
others, it
may or may not be carved from francois's time.



> > 45		Multi Area / Multi AS TE
> > 		- Operational perspective	Anyone?
> > 		- draft-zhang update		Zhang
> Good to see multi-area TE back in the TEWG discussion.  Perhaps it's time
> to resurrect the multi-area TE requirements:
> http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf-announce/Current/msg15882.html
> expired, but still available at:
> http://www.watersprings.org/links/mlr/id/draft-ash-multi-area-te-reqmts-0
> 1.txt
Since this is not a request for time I wont speak of it besides to say I 
have
no burning desire to drag out expired drafts.

Ed