[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Preemption with MAM RE:

To: "'Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)'" <flefauch@cisco.com>, "Lai, Wai S (Waisum), ALABS" <wlai@att.com>, Geunhyung Kim <geunkim@postech.ac.kr>, Te-Wg <te-wg@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Preemption with MAM RE:
From: Dimitry Haskin <dhaskin@axiowave.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:25:38 -0500

Francois,

> 
> It may be that another model which has independent bandwidth 
> constraint + aggregate constraint (this would basically be a 
> hybrid between MAM and RDM) is a reasonable idea; but this is 
> not MAM as it is currently defined.
> 

Incidentally this is exactly what I have been assuming regarding the MAM
model. However I agree this is not reflected in the current MAM
specification(s).

Dimitry

> Cheers
> 
> Francois
>

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Preemption with MAM RE:
  - From: "Geunhyung Kim" <geunkim@postech.ac.kr>

Prev by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tewg-diff-te-russian-02.txt
Next by Date: RE: Preemption with MAM RE:
Previous by thread: Preemption with MAM RE:
Next by thread: RE: Preemption with MAM RE:
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread