[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (a) Inter-Area, (b) Inter-AS (c) both (d) neither
- To: <te-wg@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: (a) Inter-Area, (b) Inter-AS (c) both (d) neither
- From: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 09:43:41 +0100
Jim,
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Geib, Ruediger [mailto:Ruediger.Geib@t-systems.com]
>> Sent: 28 March 2003 08:57
>> To: jboyle@pdnets.com
>> Cc: te-wg@ops.ietf.org
>> Subject: RE: (a) Inter-Area, (b) Inter-AS (c) both (d) neither
>>
>>
>> Hi Jim
>>
>> my preference is (a) and (b). To make clear
>> why I didn't opt for (c): keep both issues
>> separated. If there are people interested
>> in inter area TE, they should produce a
>> draft. I prefer having a good inter domain
>> TE standard and no inter area standard to
>> having a mediocre standard covering both.
>>
I'd like to echo Rudiger's words.
Cheers
Francois
>> Regards, Rudiger
>>
>> Rudiger Geib
>> T-Systems
>> Systems Integration
>> Senior Expert, Technologiezentrum
>> Am Kavalleriesand 3, 64295 Darmstadt
>> Germany
>> Fon: +49 6151 832138
>> http://www.t-systems.com
>>
>>
>>