RE: Reflecting new-MAM/SAM definition in diff-te drafts

["Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>]

Jerry,

>> 
>> Yes, we need a formula to make explicit the 'implicit' 
>> constraint (and for all the BC models, not just MAM).
>> 

That's a good point.

With RDM, the proposed formula of:
>>      o SUM (Normalized(CTc)) <= Max Reservable Bandwidth, 
>>          for all "c" in the range 0 <= c <= (MaxCT-1)

already applies, since we have:
	- SUM (Normalised(CTc)) <= BC0, and
	- BC0=Max Reservable Bw

It would be nice to have exact same formula also apply to MAM.

Cheers

Francois