[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Dropping the Local Overbooking Multiplier (LOM) method from DS-TE specs?

To: "Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>, <te-wg@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Dropping the Local Overbooking Multiplier (LOM) method from DS-TE specs?
From: "Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <gash@att.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 15:53:13 -0500
Cc: "Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <gash@att.com>

Francois,

> Thoughts on dropping/keeping LOM in base DS-TE specs?

I certainly favor dropping LOM if there is only weak justification.  There seems to be ample flexibility in overbooking with both 'Link Size Overbooking' and 'LSP Size Overbooking' options available.

Thanks,
Jerry

Prev by Date: RE: link capacity and reservable
Next by Date: RE: link capacity and reservable
Previous by thread: RE: Dropping the Local Overbooking Multiplier (LOM) method from DS-TE specs?
Next by thread: RE: Dropping the Local Overbooking Multiplier (LOM) method from DS-TE specs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread