RE: Dropping the Local Overbooking Multiplier (LOM) method from DS-TE specs?

["Francois Le Faucheur (flefauch)" <flefauch@cisco.com>]

Sanjay,

>> > 
>> > Overall, I don't think the case has been made to drop LOM, 
>> 
>>   Personally, I agree with this view [given that LOM is already
>>   an optional feature]
>>

Fair enough. 
Now at the same time we have a number of people (Siva, I believe Dimitry
and Siva) who indicated preference for dropping LOM. So I'm trying to
find out something we can agree on. Which is why I am folloiwng up on
your "second choice" in my other email 8^)

Cheers

Francois