[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tewg-measure-06.txt
- To: "Lai, Wai S (Waisum), ALABS" <wlai@att.com>, "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, <te-wg@ops.ietf.org>
- Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tewg-measure-06.txt
- From: "Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <gash@att.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:46:43 -0500
- Cc: "Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS" <gash@att.com>
> From: Lai, Wai S (Waisum), ALABS
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 7:56 AM
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); te-wg@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-tewg-measure-06.txt
>
> Bert and all,
>
> Many thanks for the AD review and the subsequent comments.
> We have now completed our revision of the TE Measurement draft
> based on your inputs. The main body of document has been much
> shortened and streamlined - with requirements clearly identified.
> Supporting materials have been moved to Appendices.
> Please review.
>
> Thanks, Wai Sum
I think the 06-draft http://ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tewg-measure-06.txt well addresses Bert's comments:
'I would expect a CRISP set of "requirements for additional measurements, configurable/negotiable parameters/controls" ... but not the extensive exploration and text that I now see'.
The requirements are now clearly identified for additional measurements, configurable/negotiable parameters/controls, etc., and the main text has been greatly shortened.
It would be good to hear from Bert on this. Can we now move forward and finalize?
Thanks,
Jerry