RE: FW: DT's review of draft-ietf-tewg-mib-06.txt

["Naidu, Venkata" <Venkata.Naidu@Marconi.com>]

Dave,

-> Right.  It sounds like we agree that TE tunnels are no 
-> different from other types of tunnels, except for the fact 
-> Kireeti pointed out to me that _some_ types of TE tunnels 
-> don't encapsulate over IP, but the model for TE tunnels 
-> over IP is no different from the model for other tunnels 
-> over IP.

  Agree. Why do we, here, care about those _some_ type of
  TE tunnels tunneled over non-IP ? Let us make *terminology*
  and *semantics* correct at least w.r.t IP.

Venkata.

PS: Dave, thanks for pointing out RFC2011 update draft.