Re: WG Review: IPv6 Operations (v6ops)

[Brian Haberman <bkhabs@nc.rr.com>]

Pekka Savola wrote:
> 
> There are two cases, I think:
> 
> 1) network (ISP/core) transition.  Folks who feel stuff like IGP or BGP
> tunneling is really needed etc.

Is this really the case?  The large operators I have talked to don't
want any transition tools in their core.  They see 6to4, ISATAP, NAT-PT,
various tunneling mechanisms, etc. as a leaf network solution.  Their
core is native v6.

> 
> Most probably agree that complexity in the core networks is highly
> undesirable.

Agreed.

Brian