[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: WG Review: IPv6 Operations (v6ops)
- To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: WG Review: IPv6 Operations (v6ops)
- From: Brian Haberman <bkhabs@nc.rr.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 18:02:53 -0400
- Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 15:06:57 -0700
- Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
Pekka Savola wrote:
>
> There are two cases, I think:
>
> 1) network (ISP/core) transition. Folks who feel stuff like IGP or BGP
> tunneling is really needed etc.
Is this really the case? The large operators I have talked to don't
want any transition tools in their core. They see 6to4, ISATAP, NAT-PT,
various tunneling mechanisms, etc. as a leaf network solution. Their
core is native v6.
>
> Most probably agree that complexity in the core networks is highly
> undesirable.
Agreed.
Brian