Re: WG Review: IPv6 Operations (v6ops)

[Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   > 1) network (ISP/core) transition.  Folks who feel stuff like IGP or BGP
   > tunneling is really needed etc.
   
   Is this really the case?  The large operators I have talked to don't
   want any transition tools in their core.  They see 6to4, ISATAP, NAT-PT,
   various tunneling mechanisms, etc. as a leaf network solution.  Their
   core is native v6.
   
=> this is not true for cores using MPLS where some hacks are used
for IPv6 support (aka 6PE, etc): you can't say this is native v6...

Regards

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr