[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 6to4 relays [Re: WG Review: IPv6 Operations (v6ops)]
- To: Brian E Carpenter <brian@hursley.ibm.com>
- Subject: Re: 6to4 relays [Re: WG Review: IPv6 Operations (v6ops)]
- From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:15:28 +0300 (EEST)
- Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:16:24 -0700
- Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Francis Dupont wrote:
> >
> > In your previous mail you wrote:
> >
> > > => I am not convinced by 6to4. For instance by the 6to4-relay concept.
> >
> > 6to4 relays cause some rather interesting problems, especially relating to
> > quality of service (too few of them at the moment, leading to huge
> > delays connecting to 6to4 nodes from some areas).
>
> If the worst problem with 6to4 is already a purely operational one,
> I'm not at all distressed, and I wonder whether we can encourage
> all XPs to operate a 6to4 relay?
I wonder if we can encourage Microsoft implementations not to assume bogus
things about 6to4 relays. Like it having the address
'2002:<RELAY_IPv4>::<RELAY_IPv4>'.
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords