[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unmanaged scope comments
- To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Subject: Re: unmanaged scope comments
- From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 00:48:01 +0900
- Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 08:48:14 -0700
- Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
>==> connectivity includes one very important component IMO: the quality of
>network connections. This is often ignored. It's a high risk for a vendor
>to enable IPv6 by default, for example, if that'd result in lower quality
>connections to e.g. dual-stack web servers (a very real fact in 6bone), this
>should be taken into consideration at least in the short term.
i don't understand what you want to do about it. will you ping/ping6
destination and pick shorter roundtrip? when multiple A records
are returned for www.foo.com, do you probe them to get the optimal
performance? i believe the "quality" factor does not matter, and
it cannot be measured from endpoint (at least within short time).
itojun