[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comment on unmanaged analysis presentation/doc
- To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: comment on unmanaged analysis presentation/doc
- From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:44:42 +0000
- Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 09:44:52 -0700
- Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
> This implies that filters need to look inside type 41 IP packets.
yes.
> of course, it's dangerous to suggest this, because there will be
> a strong temptation to just block all type 41 packets - since
> presumably it's much easier to do that.
it's easier still to run dual-stack hosts. and there's a closure:
whenever it becomes reasonable for other reasons to run ipv6-only,
we won't need the 6to4 tunnels. either way, in the short term the
thing most folks will actually do is either dual-stack or nat, since
either one of them is easier than 6to4 (with or without tunnels and
tunnel filters.)