[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ocean: do not boil
- To: "Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>
- Subject: Re: ocean: do not boil
- From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcet.sarikaya@alcatel.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:59:22 -0500
- Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 08:00:57 -0700
- Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
- Organization: Alcatel USA
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
Hi Jim,
Bound, Jim wrote:
every input I get is that they don't want NAT and want it to go away as soon as possible. for "some" (I say some) I am being told how fast can I get rid of IPv4 period at least on my site. that "some" is as important as the Lowest Common Denominator or one size fits all view to me as an engineer.
I would like to hope that you are right (and are in line with the
operators and enterprises). For Keith, I understand, in academia one
wants the latest.
What are the views then on the issue of IPv6 NATs?
/jim
--behcet