RE: ocean: do not boil

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

Just as a note this is one of the benefits stated in DSTM and objective.  IPv6 becomes the dominant protocol.  

/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Senthil Sivakumar [mailto:ssenthil@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:42 PM
> To: Margaret Wasserman
> Cc: Keith Moore; Bound, Jim; itojun@iijlab.net; Stewart Tansley;
> v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: ocean: do not boil 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > >it's a tradeoff - NAT-PT is probably slightly less 
> functional to apps (will
> > >cause a few more apps to break than NATs do) but in 
> exchange for using it
> > >you get to get rid of all IPv4 traffic on your local network.
> >
> > What is the advantage of getting rid of all IPv4 traffic on 
> the local
> > network, since it will just be replaced with translated 
> IPv6 traffic?
> >
> You dont have to run IPv4 routing protocols along with IPv6 routing
> protocols, which IMO, is an operational advantage.
> 
> Senthil
> > Margaret
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>