RE: ocean: do not boil

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

agree completely.  I completely support defining the lowest common denominators for sure.  I just don't think that should preclude discussion on other tools and topics thats all.  I can operate in a multi-threaded manner :--)

/jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Moore [mailto:moore@cs.utk.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 11:52 PM
> To: Bound, Jim
> Cc: Keith Moore; Margaret Wasserman; itojun@iijlab.net; 
> Stewart Tansley;
> v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: ocean: do not boil 
> 
> 
> I do think we will need a variety of transition tools because 
> not everyone's
> transition scenario will be the same.  At the same time, some 
> of the tools
> we have seem clearly superior and more widely applicable to others
> that cover (some of) the same spaces.  So it would be good if we could
> identify some of the less useful tools and/or concentrate on the more 
> useful tools and any missing pieces that are identified.
>