[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: tiny v6 operational issue
- To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: tiny v6 operational issue
- From: Harald Koch <chk@pobox.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:50:05 -0400
- Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 06:52:24 -0700
- Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
> It _IS_ a problem. It is effectively same condition as that the NS records
> point to a server where name server is not running. Of course, there is
> a chance to resolve by next available address or NS. But it IS a bogus
> configuration anyway, since it forces unneeded traffic and delay.
The resolver(s) on my hosts (RH 7.2) do not fall back to the IPv4
address if the IPv6 address is unreachable. This is definitely a bug on
the client side, but still aggravated the problem.
--
Harald Koch <chk@pobox.com>