Re: tiny v6 operational issue

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

>> i wonder if doc needs to be updated to check this.
> It should be documented here in v6ops since it is not a dns problem but
> general problems among services.  I.e. if you put AAAA record to a node,
> all the services at the node should be served also via IPv6.  Otherwise,
> the FQDN should be splitted between the services which served only via
> IPv4 and served via IPv6/IPv4.

it is obvious to me that one must provide all services on all
addresses.  given

   foo.bar.  A    1.2.3.4
	     A	  5.6.7.8
	     AAAA 2001:666:777::42

we do not currently require that all services provided on 1.2.3.4
also be provided on 5.6.7.8.  so how can we explain doing so for
2001:666:777::42?

and the splitting suggestion seems to put more semantics in names
than the dns folk may feel appropriate.

i suspect you are trying to bind more semantics to the dns than are
generally expected there.

randy