[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IPv6 tunnel over NAT
- To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: IPv6 tunnel over NAT
- From: Rob Austein <sra+v6ops@hactrn.net>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 21:46:43 -0400
- Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 18:47:12 -0700
- Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
- User-agent: Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) SEMI/1.14.4 (Hosorogi) FLIM/1.14.4(Kashiharajingū-mae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.0(HANANOEN)
At Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:18:08 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
>
> to what extent could BGP policy be used to accomplish divide-and-conquer
> for 6to4 relay routers?
I'm pretty sure that it wouldn't solve the problem (I suspect you need
actual routers to do that, not just routing policy), and from
everything I hear BGP is already badly overloaded without taking on
new duties, but I confess that the idea of trying to do this with BGP
hadn't occurred to me, so I can't claim to have thought about it much.