[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New draft on embedding the RP address in IPv6 multicast address

To: ken lindahl <lindahl@uclink.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: New draft on embedding the RP address in IPv6 multicast address
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 08:55:42 +0900
Cc: mboned@network-services.uoregon.edu, v6ops@ops.ietf.org,nesg@es.net
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 16:56:05 -0700
Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com

>>Sure, IGMPv3, MLDv2 snooping would be nice but it seems hypocritical to
>>say this is the reason why SSM isn't being used..
>IGMPv2 snooping is enabled now on large parts of campus. i don't think
>IGMPv3 will play nicely with that. disabling IGMP snooping so that SSM
>will work doesn't seem like a step forward. where's the hypocracy in
>that?

	doesn't host compatibility mode behavior (draft-ietf-idmr-igmp-v3-11.txt
	7.2) help this situation?  caveat: i'm no multicast expert.

itojun

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed 6to4 work (security)
Next by Date: Re: New draft on embedding the RP address in IPv6 multicast address
Previous by thread: Re: New draft on embedding the RP address in IPv6 multicast address
Next by thread: Re: New draft on embedding the RP address in IPv6 multicast address
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread