[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-ymbk-6to4-arpa-delegation-00.txt

To: Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@sun.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ymbk-6to4-arpa-delegation-00.txt
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 13:16:30 -0500
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:51:44 -0800
Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
In-reply-to: <3DD021DC.70400@sun.com>
References: <20021111190712.294FD7AF@starfruit.itojun.org><3DD021DC.70400@sun.com>
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org

--On 11. november 2002 13:32 -0800 Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@sun.com> wrote:

I would like not to change it too, but the alternative to create records
on the fly in the DNS servers is an invitation for DOS attack on DNSsec...

why?

the synthesized records are "like" glue records, aren't they?
so they shouldn't be signed anyway....?

          Harald

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-ymbk-6to4-arpa-delegation-00.txt
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

References:
- Re: draft-ymbk-6to4-arpa-delegation-00.txt
  - From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@iijlab.net>
- Re: draft-ymbk-6to4-arpa-delegation-00.txt
  - From: Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>

Prev by Date: RE: API Discussion RE: v6ops Agenda for Atlanta
Next by Date: RE: API Discussion RE: v6ops Agenda for Atlanta
Previous by thread: Re: draft-ymbk-6to4-arpa-delegation-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: draft-ymbk-6to4-arpa-delegation-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread