[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 6to4 security questions

To: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
Subject: Re: 6to4 security questions
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 22:42:37 +0100
Cc: Jason Goldschmidt <jgoldsch@eng.sun.com>, Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:42:56 -0800
Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 20 Nov 2002 19:18:19 +0100. <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1037816299.29804.nordmark@bebop.france>
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   I think that would result in a separate "6to4 Internet" and "IPv6-native
   Internet" which can't (reliably) communicate which would be a very
   bad idea - so bad that we should deprecate 6to4 IMHO.

=> I agree but even we solve the security issue IMHO we have to know
why ISPs don't want to run 6to4 relays, i.e., perhaps there is also
an operational issue to solve.
 I believe they are many ISP persons reading this list. Can you explain
why there is such a low number of available 6to4 relays today?

Thanks

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr

PS (for David Kessens): this can be an item to add to the agenda
at the next RIPE meeting.

Follow-Ups:
- 6to4 relay deployment [Re: 6to4 security questions]
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>

References:
- Re: 6to4 security questions
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>

Prev by Date: Re: 6to4 security questions
Next by Date: 6to4 relay deployment [Re: 6to4 security questions]
Previous by thread: 6to4 and Teredo vs Tunnel broker (was Re: 6to4 security questions)
Next by thread: 6to4 relay deployment [Re: 6to4 security questions]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread