[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments and alternatives to draftt-huston-ietf-pact-00 (long)
- To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: Comments and alternatives to draftt-huston-ietf-pact-00 (long)
- From: sbrim@cisco.com (Scott W Brim)
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:32:43 +0000 (UTC)
- Delivery-date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:44:33 -0800
- Envelope-to: v6ops-data@psg.com
- References: <10253366.1037879557@Klensin-VAIO.ietf55.ops.ietf.org>
- Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
[ post by non-subscriber. with the massive amount of spam, it is easy to
miss and therefore delete mis-posts. so fix subscription addresses! ]
John, I like what you say, but I would like to see it less formal. I
have encouraged ADs to have groups of personal trusted professional
assistants (not just area secretariats, although there could be
overlap), who could take care of all the tasks you suggest for
offloading.
..Scott
-
This message was passed through ietf_censored@carmen.ipv6.cselt.it, which
is a sublist of ietf@ietf.org. Not all messages are passed.
Decisions on what to pass are made solely by Raffaele D'Albenzio.