[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: on NAT-PT

To: "Christian Huitema" <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: on NAT-PT
From: itojun@iijlab.net
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2002 11:44:30 +0900
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: huitema's message of Wed, 04 Dec 2002 18:41:29 PST. <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA1D7827@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>

>An IPv6 host doesn't have to be dead. If it has a piece of logic that
>combines a "nat-pt prefix" with the IPv4 destination address, then it
>can send the packet over IPv6 to that fabricated destination, and rely
>on the NAT-PT to do the translation job.

	it seems to me that modifying an IPv6 host for transition purposes
	is not an option.  basically it makes IPv6 hosts aware of NAT-PT (or
	whatever) translation in the middle, hence similar to RSIP model.

itojun

References:
- RE: on NAT-PT
  - From: "Christian Huitema" <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: RE: on NAT-PT
Next by Date: RE: on NAT-PT
Previous by thread: RE: on NAT-PT
Next by thread: RE: on NAT-PT
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread