[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: on NAT-PT




On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 05:54 AM, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:

unfortunately there's no documentation.
this is universally bad because
(1) it requires every node to configure the translation prefix manually
(kills spirit of autoconfigured hosts), or to cook up DHCPv6 option for
it (horrid idea),
It could be a well know prefix. You won't have to configure a special
prefix for that.
	that's much more sick.

Could you please elaborate why?

	- Alain.