[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 6to4 security questions

To: Jason Goldschmidt <jgoldsch@eng.sun.com>
Subject: Re: 6to4 security questions
From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:16:52 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: "Your message with ID" <3DDBFF8E.2010401@eng.sun.com>
Reply-to: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>

A long time ago Jason said:

> At Sun we are using 6to4, as an early transition mechanism, for our 
> deployment.  For the past few years we have had a few (read 3) 
> engineering sites connected by configured tunnels.  We found deployment 
> scalability problems with this approach, so we decided to go with 6to4. 

What Jason forgot to mention was that this deployment (inside Sun's firewalls)
uses exclusively 6to4 addresses. Thus there are no 6to4 relays.

   Erik

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 6to4 security questions
  - From: itojun@iijlab.net

Prev by Date: Re: Request to Publish ISATAP
Next by Date: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
Previous by thread: Re: Request to Publish ISATAP
Next by thread: Re: 6to4 security questions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread