Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo

[Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>]

> I've never argued against tunnel brokers for isolated hosts. Please 
> remember that 6to4 was actually designed for whole sites with no 
> IPv6 ISP, not for isolated hosts. The fact that a well-known operating 
> system ships 6to4 for isolated hosts doesn't change the original design 
> point.

My point is that tunnel brokers (plus prefix delegation?) might make 
sense beyond isolated hosts as well. For instance, it might make sense for
a home router.

The configuration isn't the elusive "zero", but it can be simple enough to
be used.

I wonder if there is any data on the fraction of the existing tunnel
broker clients serve more than one host. (It does at the office in France.)

  Erik