[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo

To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 13:33:39 +0100
Cc: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, Erik.Nordmark@sun.com, brian@hursley.ibm.com, jgraessley@apple.com, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20030120063702.269e6317.moore@cs.utk.edu>; from moore@cs.utk.edu on Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 06:37:02AM -0500
References: <Roam.SIMC.2.0.6.1043013140.21778.nordmark@bebop.france> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301200622240.12543-100000@netcore.fi> <20030120063702.269e6317.moore@cs.utk.edu>
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 06:37:02AM -0500, Keith Moore wrote:
> address selection is fundamentally broken.  it only works with two-party apps.

Could you elaborate this a bit more?  Everything that uses TCP or UDP
is a "two-party connection" - otherwise, you use multicast, which has
a completely different set of "address selection" issues.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  55857  (55593)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster@Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299

Follow-Ups:
- Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
  - From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>

References:
- Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
  - From: Erik Nordmark <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>
- Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
  - From: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
Next by Date: Re: on NAT-PT
Previous by thread: Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
Next by thread: Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread