[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo

To: Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>
Subject: Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
From: "Fred L. Templin" <ftemplin@IPRG.nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:25:07 -0800
Cc: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>, "'Erik Nordmark'" <Erik.Nordmark@sun.com>, "'Joshua Graessley'"<jgraessley@apple.com>, v6ops@ops.ietf.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301180026530.22083-100000@netcore.fi> <2786140000.1043032579@Router>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01

Marc Blanchet wrote:

-- samedi, janvier 18, 2003 00:34:07 +0200 Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
wrote/a icrit:
(btw, I think tunnel brokering would get off a bit if a client+server code
using some agreed protocol
TSP?

I have previously stated that I see merits in the TSP approach, but in
a complimentary (not competitive) sense wrt automatic tunneling. I believe
automatic tunneling can provide a ubiquitous, connectionless mechanism with
configured (and/or "semi-automatic") tunnels providing a connection-oriented
mechanism for special use-cases (e.g., when stronger security, bi-directonal
links, etc. are needed). See: 'draft-templin-interact-00.txt' for text
describing how an automatic tunneling mechanism (in this case, ISATAP)
can coexist with TSP.

Fred Templin
ftemplin@iprg.nokia.com

References:
- RE: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
  - From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
- RE: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
  - From: Marc Blanchet <Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
Next by Date: Re: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
Previous by thread: RE: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
Next by thread: RE: An alternative to 6to4 and teredo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread