RE: agenda items for v6ops in San Francisco

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

>>> this has some appeal.  also, i think a generic discussion of they types of
>>> security issues raised by transition mechanisms might be worthwhile.  i
>>> suspect that we would benefit from a common and consistent story for both of
>>> these.
>> I'd say this argues for a second session. I don't see it fitting into
>> anything like 20 minutes.
> I tend to agree with Brian. Could this be done somehow separately maybe
> some evening/morning/Sunday?

given recent deep discussions of the widely disliked results of dealing with
architectural and security issues late in the design and document process as
opposed to early, i find a suggestion to 'bury' discussions of such
considerations and keep right on hacking rather droll, to say the least.

randy