Ok, I was hoping that we could come up with something in the middle that might give consumer oriented ISPs an incentive to start looking at IPv6. But that might be to create to much work and delay the outcome.The latter but an extension to IPv4-NAT to support IPv6. In other words NAT admits it is evil but now has seen the light and trys to help move users to IPv6.Assume there is not enough Ipv4 address space for providers to give out to all subscribers or cannot at reasonable cost. But they can give the subscriber an IPv6 prefix. This means 6to4 orISATAP won'twork in this scenario in the users home.Are you saying this as an alternative to IPv4 NAT or as a complement? (I assume the latter)
The idea is to deal with the reality but move forward.
That is one of my business goals. Exactly. But I can only help invent the technology. But we do have resources in the v6 deployment community to reach out to these players.If you mean the first of what I wrote above, I could finally see something that could make consumer oriented operators look at IPv6.
Question is if we have the tools for them... - kurtis -