Re: IPv6 Home Use to stimulate deployment over IPv4-NAT

[Alain Durand <Alain.Durand@Sun.COM>]

The unmanaged scenario, case A, calls for tunneling over UDP.
2 possible solutions are teredo or tunnel broker with tunneling over UDP.

If we want to explore the tunnel broker solution, I do not think RFC3053
needs an update. It is a framework document that explain the concept of 
tunnel broker.
What is needed are two documents:
- one that explain IPv6 over UDP over IPv4
- one that described a simple automatic protocol to set up the 
configuration parameters
between the client (access router) and the tunnel broker. A DHCPv4 
extension would work,
somethink like marc blanchet's TSP protocol would work also. Maybe the 
first think to
do is to work on some requirements for such a protocol.

   - Alain.

Margaret Wasserman wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> At 12:59 PM 2/21/2003 -0500, Bound, Jim wrote:
>
> > I caught that in the rfc too.  Yes we need an updated tunnel rfc or
> > draft.
> > Would that be valid work here ?  Chairs ?
>
> I'm not quite sure what you are asking...  Are you asking
> about an update to RFC 3053 that would explain how to use
> it over a NAT?
>
> If the need for something like this is indicated by the
> unmanaged or enterprise scenario/analysis efforts, we
> would probably want to pursue this in v6ops (I can't
> think of another WG that would be more appropriate).
>
> Margaret