RE: Document Review: Volunteers Needed

["Bound, Jim" <Jim.Bound@hp.com>]

No comment to those all volunteeriung. But that's 3 right there.  Almost as many that responded to last call :--) Amazing.
/jim

 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: César Olvera Morales [mailto:cesar.olvera@consulintel.es] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:02 AM
> To: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Document Review: Volunteers Needed
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'm working with Jordi Palet, and I would like to participate 
> in this effort.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> César Olvera
> Consulintel
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Margaret Wasserman" <mrw@windriver.com>
> To: <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
> Cc: "Bob Fink" <bob@thefinks.com>; "Itojun" <itojun@iijlab.net>
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 4:33 AM
> Subject: Document Review: Volunteers Needed
> 
> 
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The recent poor response to our document last calls (2 comments for 
> > one document, 4 comments for the other) is insufficient to justify 
> > advancing these documents to the IESG.
> >
> > Before we advance these document, or any documents, to the IESG, we 
> > want to be certain that they have been reviewed by a significant 
> > number of people representing a cross-section of areas of expertise.
> >
> > In an effort to fix this problem, Bob, Itojun and I are considering 
> > forming a semi-official v6ops document review team.
> >
> > This team would consist of people who are willing to spend 
> a couple of 
> > hours reviewing and commenting on v6ops documents at each 
> stage of the 
> > process -- WG acceptance, major intermediate revisions, WG last 
> > call(s), revisions to address IESG comments, etc.
> >
> > The review team would be chosen from a pool of volunteers 
> to represent 
> > a broad range of knowledge and expertise, and members would 
> be removed 
> > if they are too frequently non-responsive.  All review 
> comments would 
> > be sent to the list, and treated like any individual comments.
> >
> > Like most new processes, we don't know exactly how this
> > would work, and there will probably be bugs to work out
> > over time...  But, we strongly feel that we have to do something to 
> > ensure that our documents are well reviewed before they are 
> accepted 
> > by the WG and/or advanced to the IESG.  We also hope that 
> our efforts 
> > may serve as a useful model for improvements in this area 
> throughout 
> > the IETF.
> >
> > What does the WG think about this idea?
> >
> > If you think that this is a good idea, how could we give credit to 
> > this team?  Perhaps list them on the v6ops alternate web-site, and 
> > list them as "technical reviewers" in the acknowledgements 
> section of 
> > our published documents?
> >
> > Who would be willing to volunteer for this type of role?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Margaret
> >
> 
> *********************************
> Madrid 2003 Global IPv6 Summit
> 12-14 May 2003 - Pre-register at:
> http://www.ipv6-es.com
> Interested in participating or sponsoring ?
> Contact us at ipv6@consulintel.es
> 
> 
> 
>